Solution Report: Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx
| Num Ruptures | 447,797 |
|---|
| Num Single-Stranded Ruptures | 447,797 (100.00%) |
| Total Supra-Seis Rupture Rate | 0.04485437 |
| Total Supra-Seis Recurrence Interval | 22.29 yrs |
| Total Moment Rate | 2.918824e19 N-m/yr |
| Deformation Model Total Moment Rate | 3.120471e19 N-m/yr |
| Magnitude Range | [6.03,8.72] |
| Length Range | [1.86,1132.40] km |
| Rupture Section Count Range | [2,109] |
Table Of Contents
(top)
Test down-dip subsectioning rup set
Logic Tree Branch
(top)
| Level | Choice |
|---|
| Fault Regime | Fault Regime |
| NZSHM22_SpatialSeisPDF | NZSHM22_1346 |
| Slip Along Rupture Model (Dsr) | Uniform |
| NZSHM22_ScalingRelationship | NZSHM22_ScalingRelationship |
| NZSHM22_DeformationModel | Fault Model |
Solution MFDs
(top)
Total Target MFDs
(top)
| Incremental MFDs | Cumulative MFDs |
|---|
 |  |
NZ RECTANGLE SANS TVZ Gridded Region
(top)
| Incremental MFDs | Cumulative MFDs |
|---|
 |  |
NZ TVZ Gridded Region
(top)
| Incremental MFDs | Cumulative MFDs |
|---|
 |  |
Simulated Annealing Energy
(top)
| Iterations | 118,349,565 |
|---|
| Time | 1 hour 0.3 mins |
| Iterations Per Sec. | 32,685 |
| Perturbations | 11,347,436 |
| Iterations Per Perturb. | 10.43 |
| Total Energy | 2.11659379E9 |
Final Energies
(top)
| Energy Type | Final Energy (1 hour 0.3 mins) | % of Total | After 30 mins |
|---|
| Total Energy | 2.11659379E9 | | 2.12702349E9 |
| Equality Energy | 2.11659302E9 | 100.00% | 2.12702246E9 |
| Entropy Energy | 0.0 | 0.00% | 0.0 |
| Inequality Energy | 835.82794 | 0.00% | 983.15784 |
| Normalized Slip Rate | 1.08034824E8 | 5.10% | 1.17018624E8 |
| Unnormlized Slip Rate | 7939331.0 | 0.38% | 9245832.0 |
| Paleoseismic Event Rate | 42185.3 | 0.00% | 40404.63 |
| Laplacian Smoothing (49 parents) | 91.76889 | 0.00% | 99.69748 |
| Rupture Rate Minimization | 0.0 | 0.00% | 0.0 |
| Normalized MFD Equality | 2.00057651E9 | 94.52% | 2.00071744E9 |
| Normalized MFD Inequality | 835.82794 | 0.00% | 983.15784 |
Energy Progress
(top)
Rupture Rate Distribution
(top)
| Non-zero ruptures | 25,831 (5.77%) |
|---|
| Avg. # perturbations per rupture | 25.34058 |
| Avg. # perturbations per non-zero rupture | 439.29526 |
Participation Rates
(top)
Plausibility Configuration
(top)
Connection Strategy
(top)
| Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx |
|---|
| Name | Adaptive (r₀=6.0 km) Plausible (3 filters): maxDist=15 km, MultiEnds |
| Max Jump Dist | 15 km |
| Possible parent-section connections | Total: 2248, Avg: 3.99, Range: [0,16] |
| Actual connections (after applying filters) | Total: 1205, Avg: 4.55, Range: [1,17] |
Splays
(top)
| Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx |
|---|
| Max Allowed Splays | 0 |
Plausibility Filters
(top)
| Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx |
|---|
| Cumulative Rake Change ≤360 |
| Min Sections Per Parent |
| Net Rupture [[Sum [Num ≥0]]/Count]>0.75 |
| No Indirect Connections |
| P(Rel Slip Rate (@incr.)) ≥0.05 |
| P(Shaw07 [R₀=3]) ≥0.001 |
| Path [P(Rel CFF Sect, Fav15km) ≥0.01, P(CFF Sect Ratio, N=2, Fav15km) ≥0.5] |
Rupture Scalar Histograms
(top)
Rupture Length
(top)
Total length (km) of the rupture, not including jumps or gaps.
Rupture Length vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Rupture Magnitude
(top)
Magnitude of the rupture.
Rupture Magnitude vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Maximum Jump Dist
(top)
The maximum jump distance in the rupture.
Maximum Jump Dist vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Cumulative Jump Dist
(top)
The total cumulative jump distance summed over all jumps in the rupture.
Cumulative Jump Dist vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Cumulative Rake Change
(top)
Cumulative rake change for this rupture.
Cumulative Rake Change vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Max Slip Rate Difference
(top)
The difference between the slip rate of the sections with the highest and lowest slip rate in the rupture.
Max Slip Rate Difference vs Rupture Rate
(top)
Attached Modules
(top)
List of all modules that have been attached to this Solution.
Note: Modules classes in the standard modules package, org.opensha.sha.earthquake.faultSysSolution.modules, have been shortened to omit the package name.
Rupture Set Modules
(top)
| Name | Implementing Class |
|---|
| Single-Strand Cluster Ruptures | ClusterRuptures$SingleStranded |
| Plausibility Configuration | org.opensha.sha.earthquake.faultSysSolution.ruptures.plausibility.PlausibilityConfiguration |
| Polygon Fault Grid Associations | PolygonFaultGridAssociations$Precomputed |
| Section Distance-Azimuth Calculator | org.opensha.sha.earthquake.faultSysSolution.ruptures.util.SectionDistanceAzimuthCalculator |
| Rupture Connection Search | org.opensha.sha.earthquake.faultSysSolution.ruptures.util.RuptureConnectionSearch |
| Section Slip Rates | SectSlipRates$Precomputed |
| Section Areas | SectAreas$Precomputed |
| Info | InfoModule |
| Logic Tree Branch | nz.cri.gns.NZSHM22.opensha.enumTreeBranches.NZSHM22_LogicTreeBranch |
| Inversion Target MFDs | InversionTargetMFDs$Precomputed |
| Rupture Average Slips | AveSlipModule$Precomputed |
| Modified Section Minimum Magnitudes | ModSectMinMags$Precomputed |
| Uniform Slip Along Rupture | SlipAlongRuptureModel$Uniform |
Solution Modules
(top)
| Name | Implementing Class |
|---|
| Annealing Progress | org.opensha.sha.earthquake.faultSysSolution.inversion.sa.completion.AnnealingProgress |
| OpenSHA Build Information | BuildInfoModule |
| Sub-Seismogenic On-Fault MFDs | SubSeismoOnFaultMFDs |
Fault Section Connections
(top)
Slip Rates
(top)
Linear Slip Rate Plots
(top)
Log10 Slip Rate Plots
(top)
Jump Counts Over Distance
(top)
Supra-seismogenic Jump Counts
(top)
| As Discretized | Rate Weighted |
|---|
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
M≥7 Jump Counts
(top)
| As Discretized | Rate Weighted |
|---|
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
Hazard Maps
(top)
Hazard map comparisons with a resolution of 1 degrees (400 sites). Hazard is computed with the ASK2014 GMPE, default site parameters, and supra-seismogenic fault sources only.
PGA Hazard Maps
(top)
PGA, 2% in 50 year Hazard Maps
(top)
PGA, 10% in 50 year Hazard Maps
(top)
1s SA Hazard Maps
(top)
1s SA, 2% in 50 year Hazard Maps
(top)
1s SA, 10% in 50 year Hazard Maps
(top)
Fault Segmentation
(top)
The following plots show implied segmentation from the rates of this fault system solution.
NOTE: Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx has multiple jumping points between parent sections. We consolidate all jumps to occur at a single jumping point (with the highest jumping rate) and average quantities on either side of the jump (participation/slip rates)
Supra-Seismogenic Fault Segmentation
(top)
Connection Rates
This shows the rate at which each connection is taken.
Connection Passthrough Rates
(top)
Passthrough rates refer to the ratio of the jumping rate to the rates on either side of the jump. The denominator of that ratio can be either the minimum, maximum, or average of the subsection rates on either side of the jump. Each choice of denomiator is plotted separately.
Connection Passthrough Rates vs Shaw 2007
(top)
This plots passthrough rates versus various the distance relationship established in Shaw (2007).
| Linear | Log10 |
|---|
 |  |
Connection Passthrough Rates vs Scalars
(top)
This plots passthrough rates versus various scalar values (for each rate combiniation type).
| Jump Distance (km) | Jump Distance (km) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Slip Rate Change| (mm/yr) | |Slip Rate Change| (mm/yr) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| Slip Rate Ratio (mm/yr) | Slip Rate Ratio (mm/yr) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Dip Change| (degrees) | |Dip Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Rake Change| (degrees) | |Rake Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Azimuth Change| (degrees) | |Azimuth Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
M≥7.0 Fault Segmentation
(top)
Connection Rates
This shows the rate at which each connection is taken.
Connection Passthrough Rates
(top)
Passthrough rates refer to the ratio of the jumping rate to the rates on either side of the jump. The denominator of that ratio can be either the minimum, maximum, or average of the subsection rates on either side of the jump. Each choice of denomiator is plotted separately.
Connection Passthrough Rates vs Shaw 2007
(top)
This plots passthrough rates versus various the distance relationship established in Shaw (2007).
| Linear | Log10 |
|---|
 |  |
Connection Passthrough Rates vs Scalars
(top)
This plots passthrough rates versus various scalar values (for each rate combiniation type).
| Jump Distance (km) | Jump Distance (km) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Slip Rate Change| (mm/yr) | |Slip Rate Change| (mm/yr) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| Slip Rate Ratio (mm/yr) | Slip Rate Ratio (mm/yr) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Dip Change| (degrees) | |Dip Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Rake Change| (degrees) | |Rake Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
| |Azimuth Change| (degrees) | |Azimuth Change| (degrees) (Log10 Rates) |
|---|
 |  |
Magnitude Connection Rate Comparisons
(top)
This comapres Solution Diagnostics: SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTU5NjMuMG83a1hx passthrough rates across magniutdes (and also for each rate combiniation type). Linear on the left, log10 on the right.
| Linear Passthrough Rates | Log10 Passthrough Rates |
|---|
 |  |
Parent Section Detail Pages
(top)
