Index of opensha Rupture Sets & reports from NZSHM22 March 2024


Subduction-Crustal Joint Rupture Set Test1: Puysegur and Alpine Fault

2024-03-18

JointRuptureSet1

Hikurangi LTB022. Trench Locked, EXP Noise Model, Min Mag 7.5. Final

2022-07-14 21:07:10 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTA3MTMw

Sweep scaling C, Nb, and deformation noise. Trench Locked, EXP Noise Model, Min Mag 7.5


Puysegur LTB009. Final

2022-07-14 21:04:08 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTA3MDMz

Sweep scaling C, min mag, N+b, coupling


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB088: Final Geologic

2022-07-14 21:00:18 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTA3MDA1

Current best inversion parameters and N+b values. Geologic slip model. EEPAS bg


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB089: Final Geodetic

2022-07-14 21:01:35 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTA3MDE0

Current best inversion parameters and N+b values. Geodetic slip model. EEPAS bg


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB063 as LTB062 with higher smoothing

2022-03-15 21:31:51 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTAwOTZhUnJzQg==

subset of LTB062 with higher smoothing


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB062 new fault depths

2022-03-15 21:28:41 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTAwNTlTd3lReA==

Depth_sans = 0.8*Dfc, Depth_TVZ = 0.667*Dfc


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB061 no TVZ MFD, no TVZ paleo constraints

2022-03-14 21:13:02 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTk3OWFIQkZL

no TVZ MFD regionalization, no TVZ paleo constraints


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB060 as LTB058 with new MFD unc

2022-03-09 11:02:13 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTg1N0xxZkNy

shallow TVZ faults, reduced slip TVZ and Sans, re-weighting


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB059 N_sans = 3.5, sweep b

2022-03-09 10:41:05 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTc2NlFaNU1S

shallow TVZ faults, reduced slip TVZ and Sans, lower N_sans, sweep b, re-weighting


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB058 Shallow TVZ

2022-03-05 20:35:26 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTQyMExBbmtj

shallow TVZ faults, reduced slip TVZ and Sans, re-weighting


NZSHM Test Tree Branch run LTB057 MFD uncertainty scalar and Sans slip scaling

2022-03-04 21:43:47 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTM2MVFEckND

sweep scaling, MFD uncertainty scalar, and Sans slip scaling


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB054 sweep MFD unc power

2022-03-01 15:56:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTI4MlZ1UndV

sweeps on uncertainty constraint weights: MFD, Slip and MFD unc power


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB053 test higher SR and MFD weights

2022-02-28 21:02:03 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTIxNWNFRVdu

sweeps on uncertainty constraint weights: MFD, Slip and Paleo


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB048 TVZ slip scaling

2022-02-25 21:53:48 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTEwNGFya1Ji

apply slip scaling to TVZ with b_tvz = 0.9


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB047 TVZ slip scaling

2022-02-25 21:28:28 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTAwN0hkTWRK

apply slip scaling to TVZ


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB046 high paleo weight

2022-02-25 08:52:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODk5N0I3cXJa

sweeping higher paleo weights to try to match recurrence on TVZ faults


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB045 lower max mag

2022-02-24 11:07:51 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODk4OEh2Z3NN

New TVZ N and b. TVZ Mmax = [7.0, 7.2]


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB043 MinMaxMag, TVZ SR

2022-02-23 22:19:02 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODkwNUdSVldR

Try to get TVZ slip rates to fit


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB042 MinMaxMag

2022-02-23 11:57:21 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODc1OHpMc0d5

As LTB041 with 60min run time


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run TTB040 MinMag

2022-02-20 20:44:54 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODU4MDU0dHNl

AS LTB038 but with regional minmag


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB038 CFM_09C, Geologic, New Paleo model sweeps

2022-02-08 10:19:01 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODQ4OEthSkVN

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - new paleo rate & probablity models - paleo weight sweeps


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB037 CFM_09C, Geodetic no prior, New Paleo model sweeps

2022-02-08 10:12:37 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODQzM2prcFNt

Geodetic no prior deformation, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - new paleo rate & probablity models - paleo weight sweeps


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB033 CFM_09C

2022-02-03 08:41:10 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Nzk5MTN6WVNn

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - new rupture set with rake fix


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB032 rerun ineq test for MFD fix

2022-01-31 18:00:56 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Nzk3MUV4N0pV

Geologic checking InEq weight: 0 - new build fixes MFD binning issue - 137-mogul build


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB031 Inequality effect test

2022-01-31 07:31:28 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Nzk2MHZzVFVm

Geologic checking InEq weight: 0 - 135-paleo-prob build


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB030 geologic

2022-01-28 08:39:51 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzkwNXV2VDRy

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - updated bN; increase MFD weights * 2; update tags - 135-paleo-prob build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB029 geodetic w geologic rates offshore

2022-01-28 07:07:15 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Nzc4MnlDWDJj

Geodetic deformation, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - updated bN; increase MFD weights * 2; update tags - using older RmlsZTozMDMuMEJCOVVY rupure set - geodetic deformation w geologic rates offshore - 135-paleo-prob build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB028 geologic

2022-01-28 07:02:11 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Nzc0MVlZN1FB

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - updated bN; increase MFD weights * 2; update tags - 135-paleo-prob build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB027 geologic w geologic rates offshore

2022-01-27 09:02:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzYzMm5XRkJY

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - using older RmlsZTozMDMuMEJCOVVY rupure set - geodetic deformation w geologic rates offshore - 135-paleo-prob build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB025 geologic

2022-01-27 06:58:26 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzQ2OExENFBC

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1957-2006) - 135-paleo-prob build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB023 (0 starting, 2 weight sets)

2022-01-23 09:44:21 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzM5NTY3VnNp

Geologic deformation only, with bN options (1840-2020, 1840-1889, 1965-2008, ) - 126-faster-inversion build - zero starting models - 2 * weight sets


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB024 (Inversion SA tests)

2022-01-22 07:34:24 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzMyME5BWWUy

- SA cooling sched tests: CLASSICAL_SA vs FAST - 126-faster-inversion build


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB022 1840-2020

2022-01-20 13:11:20 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzIyOVprRXdE

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - 126-faster-inversion build - NO starting solution, 60m (yes really 60m) runs - 5 rounds


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB021 1840-2020

2022-01-20 12:14:02 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzA2Mm9XdnJq

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - 126-faster-inversion build - NO starting solution, 60m runs - 5 rounds


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB020 1840-2020

2022-01-20 12:11:40 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzA0N1ZpeW5m

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - 126-faster-inversion build - NO starting solution, 30m runs - 5 rounds


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB019 1840-2020

2022-01-19 12:47:16 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzAwMHVreHJQ

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB017 1965-2008

2022-01-19 12:45:08 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njk2NWF5Ukpw

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2008 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB015 1840-1889

2022-01-19 12:42:56 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njk1M1A1dG83

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-1889 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB018 1840-2020

2022-01-19 12:46:42 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njk4ODdLMm1q

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 1hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB016 1965-2008

2022-01-19 12:44:31 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njk1N3NlNHhn

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2008 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 1hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB014 1840-1889

2022-01-19 11:34:47 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjkzNExYMzNx

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-1889 - 126-faster-inversion build - starting solution, 1hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB013 1840-1889

2022-01-18 23:00:35 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjgwMnlaTllq

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-1889 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB012 1840-1889

2022-01-18 22:59:57 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njc4MHkyYmgy

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-1889 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e3 & 1e5


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB011 2009-2020

2022-01-18 22:58:54 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Njc1OE1oaUFi

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 2009-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB010 2009-2020

2022-01-18 22:57:59 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjczOFBaWGli

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 2009-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e3 & 1e5


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB009 1965-2008

2022-01-18 22:56:48 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjcyN2FqU0Jh

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2008 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB008 1965-2008

2022-01-18 22:54:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjcxMjZuYkVa

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2008 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e3 & 1e5


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB007 1840-2020

2022-01-17 14:19:18 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjYwM2dtNmtC

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB006 1840-2020

2022-01-17 14:18:31 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjU5MFFNWWlN

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1840-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e3 & 1e5


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB005 1965-2020

2022-01-17 14:17:27 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjU3Njh2eDQ4

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e2 & 1e4


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB004 1965-2020

2022-01-17 14:14:58 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjU2NFZjUWZx

Geologic deformation only, with bN option 1965-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run - slip weights 1e3 & 1e5


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB002

2022-01-16 22:32:00 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjM1ME52d2hK

Geologic deformation only, with bN set for 1840-2020 - no starting solution, 8hr run


NZSHM Logic Tree Branch run LTB001

2022-01-16 22:30:12 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjM0NER6S2V4

Geologic deformation only, with bN set for 1840-2020 - starting solution, 4hr run


Largo averaging test 4 (+random seed)

2022-01-14 15:14:58 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjI2OVlpeDMy

- for Chris DiCaprio - using replica of QXV0b21hdGlvblRhc2s6NTcyNkI1OFNo setttings.


Largo averaging test 3 (+random seed)

2022-01-14 15:12:47 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjI1OFUzRnNx

- for Chris DiCaprio - using replica of QXV0b21hdGlvblRhc2s6NTcyNkI1OFNo setttings.


Modular Inversions: Randomness test 4 - real Random()

2022-01-13 17:28:42 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjI0N3o1eVU0

- repeat SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTYzNDcuMEpCZHpZ - varying inversion durations - repeat * 10


Modular Inversions: Randomness test 4 - real Random()

2022-01-13 17:23:23 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjIzNnllZ0tR

- repeat SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTYzNDcuMEpCZHpZ - varying inversion durations - repeat * 10


Modular Inversions: Puysegur Subduction - first run

2022-01-10 10:11:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjIxN01CMzQ5


Largo averaging test 2

2022-01-02 17:23:18 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjE5M0FNQlY2

- for Chris DiCaprio - using replica of QXV0b21hdGlvblRhc2s6NTcyNkI1OFNo setttings.


Largo averaging test 1

2022-01-02 17:14:21 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjE1MVhUYXJI

- for Chris DiCaprio - using replica of QXV0b21hdGlvblRhc2s6NTcyNkI1OFNo setttings.


Modular Inversions: Starting model test

2021-12-23 17:03:26 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjEwOVkyTnp5

with 4 Seed solutions


Build Seed Inversions

2021-12-23 11:48:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjA5MXRxWnVo

- for Chris DiCaprio - using replica of QXV0b21hdGlvblRhc2s6NTcyNkI1OFNo setttings.


Modular Inversions: Subduction with roughened Deformation models

2021-12-16 12:46:30 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTk1ODJNb3oy

run 1: short durations for some early insights


Modular Inversions: Randomness test 2

2021-12-10 17:26:10 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTkyOHFpTjlE

some very long times...


Modular Inversions: Randomness test 1

2021-12-09 18:37:23 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTg4N01zRHZO

- repeat SW52ZXJzaW9uU29sdXRpb246MTYzNDcuMEpCZHpZ - varying inversion durations - repeat * 10


Modular Inversions: TVZ b-Value sensitivity test 1

2021-12-09 18:18:35 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTc5MDkyWXl2

- paleo uncertainty model: UCERF3_PLUS_PT5 & UCERF3\n - new scaling_relationship SIMPLE_CRUSTAL:C=4.2


Modular Inversions: D90 C=4.2

2021-12-05 08:17:43 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTcxNzRFaWdG

- paleo uncertainty model: UCERF3_PLUS_PT5\n - new scaling_relationship SIMPLE_CRUSTAL:C=4.2


Modular Inversions: D90 C=4.2

2021-12-03 18:07:08 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTY0NE4yTUQz

- paleo uncertainty model: UCERF3 - new scaling_relationship SIMPLE_CRUSTAL:C=4.2


Modular Inversions: new rupture set

2021-12-01 13:25:47 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTU3MXVOc2NY

- paleo uncertainty model: UCERF3_PLUS_PT5


Modular Inversions: new rupture set

2021-11-29 13:56:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTQ5N2NZOFU4

- correct the transposed slip-rate weights - new build to fix https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/91


Modular Inversions: Sanity check new Rupture set

2021-11-29 11:47:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTQ2MEVrV21i

new build to fix https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/91


Modular Inversions: BASELINE3 bugfix paleo validation test 60m

2021-11-25 18:31:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTM2MDZheDdh

see https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/82


Modular Inversions: BASELINE2 bugfix paleo validation test 60m

2021-11-25 18:15:32 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTMzMXUyVXdF

see https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/82


Modular Inversions: BASELINE2 paleo validation test 60m

2021-11-25 14:48:35 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTI3MEpyaHFE

see https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/82


Modular Inversions: BASELINE1 paleo validation test 60m

2021-11-24 20:46:08 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTI0MVBkaDNI

see https://github.com/GNS-Science/nzshm-opensha/issues/82


Modular Inversions: Coulomb 2010 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper + Median bound

2021-11-19 15:03:01 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTE2OFVCV0g5

RERUN corrected scaling with High N_SANSTVZ (4.0)


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper + Median bound

2021-11-17 12:14:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTA3NDRmZ2RM

RERUN corrected scaling with High N_SANSTVZ (4.0)


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper bound

2021-11-08 13:57:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDc2OWZNeXd2

Sans-N=4.3


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper bound

2021-11-07 16:10:19 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDY5NkdnUWpj

N_Sans at 3.7; broader sweeps;


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper bound

2021-11-05 20:54:00 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDY3OXpEdFRV

targeted sans_TVZ b/N values - TEST new AWS Batch inversions


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper bound

2021-11-05 16:11:39 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDY3MGt2b3Jx

revised b/N values for Upper Bound


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geologic; Simplified Scaling Upper bound

2021-11-01 21:58:04 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDYzNmpCa3pD

targeted sans_TVZ b/N values


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geodetic vs Geologic; Generalised/Simplified Scaling

2021-10-28 16:52:11 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDU4NHRDUHdC

Sweeps on slip rate weightings


Inversions: Geodetic, Coulomb D90; TMG vs Generalised; Short

2021-10-25 09:42:52 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDUwMXdOM05U

Repeat previous run, but shortened as we can't get to the cluster - The two new scaling relations: SMPL_NZ_CRU_MN vs TMG_CRU_2017


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90; TMG vs Generalised; Short

2021-10-23 23:38:23 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDQ1MmJZRG12

Repeat previous run, but shortened as we can't get to the cluster - The two new scaling relations: SMPL_NZ_CRU_MN vs TMG_CRU_2017


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geodetic vs Geologic; Test

2021-10-19 20:11:56 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDQzMzhyWVo4

Test run investigating TargerMFD setup issue


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geodetic vs Geologic; TMG vs Generalised

2021-10-16 13:03:37 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDMzNndjaVVF

The D90 Coulomb Rupture set, with some more ballpark sweeps: - the geologic slip rates from the fault model (CFM) - the geodetic no-prior model with uniform std-dev - The two new scaling relations: SMPL_NZ_CRU_MN vs TMG_CRU_2017


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geodetic vs Geologic

2021-10-06 17:22:31 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDI1NndRVUVv

The D90 Coulomb Rutpure set, some mid-range b & N values, ball-park weight sweeps and both: - the geologic slip rates from the fault model (CFM) - the geodetic no-prior model with uniform std-dev This is 72 * 4 hour inversions, using 4 averaging threads, each with 4 selector threads.


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 Geodetic vs Geologic

2021-10-06 16:49:25 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDE4M25tZFFh

SHORT 15m sanity check run. The D90 Coulomb Rutpure set, some mid-range b & N values, ball-park weight sweeps and both: - the geologic slip rates from the fault model (CFM) - the geodetic no-prior model with uniform std-dev


Inversion on Subduction checking 'favourite' weights

2021-10-01 07:28:17 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDE1OEJSUTR1

- comparing global vs regional b & N values. - slip rates model = SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30 (east-cape smoothed)


Inversion on Subduction checking 'favourite' weights

2021-10-01 07:19:46 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDEzM2ozWXk3

- comparing global vs regional b & N values. - slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked)


Inversion on Subduction b1.0 lower-bound

2021-09-29 09:11:56 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDEyNEx2SmJT

- slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked)


Inversion on Subduction b1.0 lower-bound

2021-09-29 07:57:26 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDExNTVCcExS

- slip rates model = SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30 (east-cape smoothed)


Inversion on Subduction - NZ Simplified slip scaling MEAN

2021-09-27 17:17:32 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mzk1OFRFRFp6

- slip rates model = SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30 (east-cape smoothed)


Inversion on Subduction - NZ Simplified slip scaling MEAN

2021-09-27 14:21:22 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzkzM1hxZko5

- slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked)


Inversion on Subduction - NZ Simplified slip scaling (Upper/Lower)

2021-09-26 22:50:35 +1300

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzcxNEVDTUxE

- slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked)


Inversions on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017

2021-09-23 11:10:02 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzY2NUtia0xR

Fine-tuning weights with TMG_SUB_2017. - slip rates model = SBD_0_4_HKR_LR_30 (kermits revenge) - compare non_negativity_functions: LIMIT_ZERO_RATES vs TRY_ZERO_RATES_OFTEN


Inversions on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017

2021-09-23 10:42:13 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzY0OEFYbXYz

Fine-tuning weights with TMG_SUB_2017. - slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked) - compare non_negativity_functions: LIMIT_ZERO_RATES vs TRY_ZERO_RATES_OFTEN


Inversions on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017

2021-09-23 10:34:34 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzYzMTVSTXNr

Fine-tuning weights with TMG_SUB_2017. - slip rates model = SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30 (smoothed near East Cape) - compare non_negativity_functions: LIMIT_ZERO_RATES vs TRY_ZERO_RATES_OFTEN


Inversions on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017

2021-09-21 21:00:02 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzU1OG5rbVU1

Replaces default opensha inversion scaling (for slip constraints) with TMG - slip scaling relation = TMG_SUB_2017 - slip along model = Uniform - slip rates model = SBD_0_3_HKR_LR_30 (trench-locked)


Inversions on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017

2021-09-21 19:04:33 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzQ4NTJ6Wmg2

Replaces default opensha inversion scaling (for slip constraints) with TMG - slip scaling relation = TMG_SUB_2017 - slip along model = Uniform - slip rates model = SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30 (smoothed new East Cape)


Inversion on Subduction - TMG_SUB_2017 for slip scaling

2021-09-21 11:36:37 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzQ4M2N4ZEho

Sanity check - replacing default opensha inversion scaling (for slip constraints) with TMG - slip scaling relation = TMG_SUB_2017 - slip along model = Uniform - slip rates model = SBD_0_4_HKR_LR_30 (kermits revenge)


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction (trench-locked) RERUN

2021-09-17 14:15:23 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzQ3OFlyMk5l

More experiments on arg sweeps to be compared with kermits revenge versions re-run a subset that failed due to proxy error in last run.


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction (trench-locked)

2021-09-16 16:51:30 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzI4MEVTeVdB

More experiments on arg sweeps to be compared with kermits revenge versions


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction (Kermits revenge)

2021-09-16 16:45:16 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzI0OFhxQWNT

More experiments on arg sweeps to be compared with (locked-trench) versions


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction (Kermits revenge)

2021-09-15 07:57:37 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzIyN2FyZXNz

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - examining b - setting higher SR normlized weight - hew higher slip rate model SBD_0_4_HKR_LR_30 (Kermits revenge)


Build Hikurangi/Louisville rupture set with Kermits Revenge SBD_0_4_HKR_LR_30 fault model

2021-09-15 07:52:40 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzIyNTVqQmlF


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-14 14:09:06 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzIwMnc1eW94

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - examining b - setting higher SR normlized weight


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-14 08:20:18 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzE2MVkzeHY3

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - examining N & b


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-09 15:23:59 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzE0OG5uWlJE

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - further fine-tuning of weights/powers


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-09 11:54:30 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzEyMzJOYjJr

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - more coverage on SR and fine-tuning weights/powers


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-08 23:01:23 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MzA1MDNySmhL

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - adding N (mag_gt_5) to sweeps


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-07 17:00:44 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mjk3MjZmSDR2

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - increasing the slip weights relative to MFD



Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-07 16:21:04 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mjk0MGlnd2to

More experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - testing fix for Annealing issue & new inversion config code.


Inversions on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Subduction

2021-09-06 13:06:28 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mjg5OTllb3VZ

First experiments on MFD Uncertainty Weighted Constraint - we use a small MFD ineq weight (0.1) here to workaround an Annealing issue. - setting averaging threads = 1, and selector threads = 4 should be similar to pre-modular setup.


Build Hikurangi/Louisville ruptsets with new trench-locked fault model

2021-09-06 11:29:44 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mjg5NVpXNUZQ

No sweeps, since all our previous subduction inversions used **RmlsZTo1MzcwLjA5andhYw==** so this is identical except for the new fault model.


Modular Inversions: Coulomb D90 with target_min_mag = 7.0

2021-08-29 13:50:52 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjcxNkdIVTUy

Similar to R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjQzOXRUbnE0 using modular - setting averaging threads = 1, and selector threads = 4 should be similar to pre-modular setup. - with averaging threads = 4 we see 4 times as much CPU required. - NB the selection interval at 1 sec is much more frequent than the pre-modular which used 30 secs. This is not expected to have much effect.


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-08-29 13:31:59 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjY4M1FGajVh

A reproduction of PROD R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjY0MXE0NWY0 using modular - setting averaging threads = 1, and selector threads = 4 should be similar to pre-modular setup. - with averaging threads = 4 we see 4 times as much CPU required. - NB the selection interval at 1 sec is much more frequent than the pre-modular which used 30 secs. This is not expected to have much effect.



Index of opensha Rupture Sets & reports from NZSHM22 Round 1 May/June 2021


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-29 12:54:38 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjY2NHpONWtl

rerun repeat Constraint weight sweeps using just 1e3, 1e4 - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] - mfd_b_values = [1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-29 13:31:47 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjY4MWtWQmZt

One off run for TAG - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] - mfd_b_values = [1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e4] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e4]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-28 21:07:40 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjY0MXE0NWY0

Repeat Constraint weight sweeps using just 1e3, 1e4 - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] - mfd_b_values = [1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3, 1e4]


Inversions: Coulomb 2010 with target_min_mag = 7.0

2021-07-28 20:29:29 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjU2NVV2eERL

- completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [6*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [3.6] - mfd_b_values_sans = [1.05] - mfd_b_values_tvz = [1.25] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - seismogenic_min_mags = [7.0]


Inversions: Coulomb 2010 with target_min_mag = 7.0

2021-07-28 20:19:35 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjU0M2tyRHRL

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [6*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [0.01, 0.1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 ] - mfd_b_values_sans = [1.05] - mfd_b_values_tvz = [1.25] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3] - seismogenic_min_mags = [7.0]


Inversions: Coulomb D90 with target_min_mag = 7.0

2021-07-27 23:41:51 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjUyMTJjRzV3

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [6*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [0.01, 0.1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 ] - mfd_b_values_sans = [1.05] - mfd_b_values_tvz = [1.25] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3] - seismogenic_min_mags = [7.0]


Inversions: Coulomb D90 with target_min_mag = 7.0

2021-07-27 23:28:23 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjQzOXRUbnE0

- completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [6*60,] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [3.6 ] - mfd_b_values_sans = [1.05 ] - mfd_b_values_tvz = [1.25] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - seismogenic_min_mags = [ 7.0]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-26 21:22:57 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjM3MHlHVW04

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s with modified model from ruptset RmlsZTo1MzcwLjA5andhYw== - rounds = range(2) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 500, 1000 ] - mfd_b_values = [1.0, 1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-26 21:08:27 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjI4OFREQmNB

Testing constraint sweeps with modified model from ruptset RmlsZTo1MzcwLjA5andhYw== - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_b_values = [1.05] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Build Hikurangi/Louisville ruptsets with new Fault model SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-26 17:24:56 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjIyOHp4U2hS

Sweeping min_fill_ratio - there may be some changes with the new 30km tiles. - models = [SBD_0_2A_HKR_LR_30] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0] - scaling_relationships = [TMG_SUB_2017] - deformation_models = [None]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-25 21:55:59 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjE0NjRDc3Mz

Testing constraint sweeps with modified model from ruptset RmlsZTo0ODc0LjB3dkU1cw== - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_b_values = [1.0] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on 30km Subduction with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-25 20:47:08 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjA2N2d5ZnB2

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s with modified model from ruptset - rounds = range(2) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200 ] - mfd_b_values = [0.95, 1.0, 1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3]


Build Hikurangi/Louisville ruptsets with new Fault model SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30

2021-07-25 17:29:36 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjA1ODJSanI2

Sweeping min_fill_ratio - there may be some changes with the new 30km tiles. - models = [SBD_0_2_HKR_LR_30] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0] - scaling_relationships = [TMG_SUB_2017] - deformation_models = [None]


Inversions on 10km Subduction zone modified eastcape sliprates experiment

2021-07-21 19:54:14 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MjAwNU1veHM5

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s with modified slip model from ruptset RmlsZTo0Njk4LjBvYkpKbw== More memory, less time, more rounds. - rounds = range(4) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200 ] - mfd_b_values = [1.0 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3]


Inversions on 10km Subduction zone modified eastcape sliprates experiment

2021-07-21 19:46:20 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTk3OFdnSmJj

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s with modified slip model from ruptset RmlsZTo0Njk4LjBvYkpKbw== - rounds = range(2) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [8*60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200 ] - mfd_b_values = [1.0 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3]


Build Hikurangi/Kermadec ruptsets 10km with modifed east cape sliprate

2021-07-21 18:26:39 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTk0NTJNS2dN

For Inversion sensitivity tests - small growth epsilon 0.01 applied. - models = [SBD_0_1_HKR_LR_10_FEC] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.1,] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.01] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0] - scaling_relationships = ['TMG_SUB_2017']


Inversions on 30km Subduction zone modified eastcape sliprates experiment

2021-07-19 20:46:06 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTg2NkdyZDRY=

Testing a wide range of mfd_mag_gt_5s with modified slip model from ruptset RmlsZTo0NDYxLjBEVTRicA== - rounds = range(2) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [8*60, ] - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200 ] - mfd_b_values = [0.95, 1.0, 1.05 ] - mfd_transition_mags = [9.15, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3 ] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3]


Build Hikurangi/Kermadec ruptsets 30km with modified east cape sliprate

2021-07-19 19:17:53 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTg2MmhWZ3Zv

For Inversion sensitivity tests. - models = [SBD_0_1_HKR_LR_30_FEC] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.1,] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0] - scaling_relationships = ['TMG_SUB_2017']


Build Coulomb NZ CFM 0.3 & 0.9 with current UCERF4 defaults

2021-05-25 21:27:31 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTMyNDRibg==

With recent UCERF4-like settings, build rupture sets from NZ fault models


Inversions: Coulomb D90 with new minimum magnitudes

2021-07-18 17:48:11 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTYwNWJjbmt5

IN U3 then min_mag on seismogenic ruptures was 6.0, but here we test higher values (6.8. 7.0). - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - seismogenic_min_mags = [6.8, 7.0]


Inversions on LVR 30km Subduction zone, uniform slip, BOTH

2021-07-14 20:39:33 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTQ4N1B5RHBV

MFD vs slip rate experiment using BOTH constraints and fixed slip rate 10mm. rounds = 1 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] mfd_b_values = [1.0] mfd_transition_mags = [9.05] mfd_equality_weights = [0, 1] mfd_inequality_weights = [0, 1] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on LVR 30km Subduction zone, (in)stability test 2

2021-07-14 20:34:01 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTQ2NkxSRUhQ

rounds = 20 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] mfd_b_values = [1.0] mfd_transition_mags = [9.05] mfd_equality_weights = [1e3] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e3] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e3] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0]


Inversions on LVR 30km Subduction zone, (in)stability test 1

2021-07-14 20:30:13 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTQ0NW5kUzVR

rounds = 20 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29] mfd_b_values = [1.0] mfd_transition_mags = [9.05] mfd_equality_weights = [1e4] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH'] slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0]


Inversions on LVR 30km Subduction zone, uniform slip, NORMALIZED

2021-07-12 22:34:53 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTM5MGllNXp4

MFD vs slip rate experiment using NORMALIZED constraints and fixed slip rate 10mm. rounds = 1 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60,] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29, ] mfd_b_values = [1.0,] mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, 9.05] mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE'] slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4, ] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0]


Inversions on LVR 30km Subduction zone, uniform slip, UNNORMALIZED

2021-07-12 22:03:27 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTMzNXB1NlVi

MFD vs slip rate experiment using UNNORMALIZED constraints and fixed slip rate 10mm. rounds = 1 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60,] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29, ] mfd_b_values = [1.0,] mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, 9.1] mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED'] slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0, ] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4]

NOTE: all inversion with mfd_transition_mag=9.1 failed. This value needs to align with a bin centre.


Build Hikurangi/Kermadec & Hikurangi/Louisville ruptsets with constant 10mm slip rate

2021-07-12 17:29:12 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTMzMGFSU2Jx

- models = [SBD_0_1_HKR_KRM_30, SBD_0_1_HKR_LR_30] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.2, 0.1,] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0] - scaling_relationships = [TMG_SUB_2017] - deformation_models = [GLOBAL_SLIP_RATE_10MM]


Inversions on 2010 depth TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb, MFD vs U3 BOTH

2021-07-11 20:49:15 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTI0OE51RnVv

As per D90 but this time with Stirling 2010 depths. Note these generate more ruptures as the smaller depth leads to more sub-sections. So we're using thinned 0.2 here. MFD vs slip rate experiment using UCERF3 SR BOTH constraints. 81 permutations, 1 round. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['BOTH',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 1e2, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1, 1e2, 1e4]


Inversions on 2010 depth TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb, MFD vs U3 UNNORMALIZED

2021-07-11 20:40:45 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTIxNzlmd0RH

As per D90 but this time with Stirling 2010 depths. Note these generate more ruptures as the smaller depth leads to more sub-sections. So we're using thinned 0.2 here. MFD vs slip rate experiment using UCERF3 SR UNNORMALIZED constraints. 30 permutations, 1 round. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0,] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Build Coulomb Stirling CFM 0.9 ruptsets - memory test 100G

2021-06-19 11:22:45 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6Mzk5NmpTZ1k=

Coulomb ruptures with Stirling - test memory config** Check these will build if we have at least 100GB memory Also boosted threads to 32. - models = [CFM_0_9_SANSTVZ_2010,] - jump_limits = [15,] - adaptive_min_distances = [6,] - thinning_factors = [0.0,0.1,0.2] - min_sub_sects_per_parents = [2,] - min_sub_sections = [2]


Inversions on shortened 30km Subduction zone

2021-07-08 22:23:13 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTE3MVFMUEhk

basic MFD vs slip rate experiment using UNNORMALIZED constraints. rounds = 1 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29,] mfd_b_values = [0.94,] mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] #these are used for BOTH, NORMALIZED and UNNORMALIZED slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0,] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on shortened 30km Subduction zone

2021-07-08 22:15:39 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6MTExN2VhdzNm

basic MFD vs slip rate experiment using NORMALIZED constraints. rounds = 1 completion_energies = [0.0] max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] mfd_mag_gt_5s = [29,] mfd_b_values = [0.94,] mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE',] #these are used for BOTH, NORMALIZED and UNNORMALIZED slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4] slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0,]


Build Hikurangi/Kermadec to Louisville Ridge rupture set 30km

2021-07-08 21:32:16 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTg1MzR5dnQ=

- models = ["SBD_0_1_HKR_LR_30", ] - min_aspect_ratios = [2.0,] - max_aspect_ratios = [5.0,] - aspect_depth_thresholds = [5,] - min_fill_ratios = [0.2, 0.1] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0,] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.0,] - scaling_relationships = ["TMG_SUB_2017"]


Inversions on 2010 depth TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb, MFD vs U3 UNNORMALIZED

2021-07-07 15:01:21 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTU0TEg1WXk=

As per D90 but this time with Stirling 2010 depths. Note these actaully generate more ruptures as the smaller depth leads to more sub-sections. So we're using thinned 0.2 here. CBC Messed this up - the slip rate weight arguments for norm/unnorm are transposed, but the type of contraint was not. Probably this means that no slip rate constraints will have been effective. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e4] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0,] # 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on 2010 depth TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb, MFD vs U3 NORMALIZED

2021-07-07 14:47:17 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTI5cDNicTY=

As per D90 but this time with Stirling 2010 depths. Note these actaully generate more ruptures as the smaller depth leads to more sub-sections. So we're using thinned 0.2 here. MFD vs slip rate experiment using UCERF3 SR NORMALIZED constraints. 24 permutations, 1 round. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0,] # 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on Subduction rupture set, 30km tiles

2021-07-06 21:06:33 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODY3QXdIQVE=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using UNNORMALIZED constraints. - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] #8*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [65, ] #total rate mag>5 - mfd_b_values = [1.2, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1,] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [10, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on Subduction rupture set, 30km tiles

2021-07-06 20:58:51 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6ODMwajVjdlY=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using NORMALIZED constraints. - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] #8*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [65, ] #total rate mag>5 - mfd_b_values = [1.2, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE',] #'UNNORMALIZED',] #UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e3] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3,]


Inversions on Subduction rupture set, 30km tiles

2021-06-30 22:10:39 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzkzRXdHcDg=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using NORMALIZED constraints. - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] #8*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [0.7, ] #total rate mag>5 - mfd_b_values = [1.1, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE',] #'UNNORMALIZED',] #UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e3] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1e3,]


Inversions on Subduction rupture set, 30km tiles

2021-06-30 22:01:02 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzU2c0J0czM=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using UNNORMALIZED constraints. - rounds = range(1) - completion_energies = [0.0,] - max_inversion_times = [4*60, ] #8*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_mag_gt_5s = [0.7, ] #total rate mag>5 - mfd_b_values = [1.1, ] - mfd_transition_mags = [7.85, ] - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] #UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, ] #1, 10] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [10, 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb D90, randomness test

2021-06-30 10:15:09 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NzA4aFVNajM=

Take some mid-range weightings and run 10 8hr rounds to see if variability in final energies & MFDs can be identified. - 1 Coulomb rupture sets - 10 rounds - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2,] - mfd_inequality_weights = [ 1e3,] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_weights = [1e3,] - slip_uncertainty_scaling_factors = [2,] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [None,] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [None,]


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb D90, MFD vs U3 NORMALIZED

2021-06-29 19:25:29 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjgzVkR4emY=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using UCERF3 SR UNNORMALIZED constraints. 24 permutations, 1 round. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNNORMALIZED',] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e4] #1, 10] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [0,] # 1e2, 1e3, 1e4]


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb D90, MFD vs U3 NORMALIZED

2021-06-29 19:15:36 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjU4cnhOaGU=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using UCERF3 SR NORMALIZED constraints. 24 permutations, 1 round. - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['NORMALIZED_BY_SLIP_RATE',] - slip_rate_normalized_weights = [1, 10, 1e2, 1e4] - slip_rate_unnormalized_weights = [0,]


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFDs, Coulomb D90, MFD vs slip

2021-06-28 21:34:56 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjIyWGZKc3c=

MFD vs slip rate experiment using uncertainty adjusted SR weights. Total of 24 jobs - 1 Coulomb rupture sets - completion_energies = [0.0,] (disabled) - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [1e2, 1e3] - mfd_inequality_weights = [1e2, 1e3, 1e4] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_weights = [1e5, 1e4, 1e3, 1e2] - slip_uncertainty_scaling_factors = [2,]


Build Hikurangi/Kermadec ruptsets 30km

2021-06-28 11:21:08 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NjE1aHdiNFM=

- models = [SBD_0_1_HKR_KRM_30] - min_aspect_ratio = 2.0 - max_aspect_ratio = 5.0 - aspect_depth_threshold = 5 - min_fill_ratios = [0.2, 0.1,] - growth_position_epsilons = [0.0] - growth_size_epsilons = [0.01, 0.005, 0.0] - scaling_relationships = ['TMG_SUB_2017']


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFD - Coulomb

2021-06-24 16:27:47 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NTUwR3pWNFE=

back to 8 hours Total of 64 jobs - 4 Coulomb rupture sets from R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTMyNDRibg== - rounds = 1 - max_inversion_times = [8*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes - mfd_equality_weights = [0, 10, 100, 1000] - mfd_inequality_weights = [0, 10, 100, 1000] - slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',] - slip_rate_weights = [1000,] - slip_uncertainty_scaling_factors = [2,] - completion_energies = [0.0] (disabled)


Inversions on TVZ/SansTVZ MFD - Coulomb

2021-06-24 13:20:45 +1200

R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6NDg1UndBazQ=

Shortened to get feedback.
Repeat to get metrics, and make solution filenames unique.

Total of 64 jobs
- 4 Coulomb rupture sets from R2VuZXJhbFRhc2s6OTMyNDRibg==
- rounds = 1
- max_inversion_times = [2*60,] #3*60,] #units are minutes
- mfd_equality_weights = [1, 10, 100, 1000]
- mfd_inequality_weights = [0, 10, 100, 1000]
- slip_rate_weighting_types = ['UNCERTAINTY_ADJUSTED',]
- slip_rate_weights = [1000,]
- slip_uncertainty_scaling_factors = [2,]
- completion_energies = [0.0] (disabled)


Archived Index 01

Containing experiments with min_subsection plauability filtering


Build Coulomb NZ CFM 0.9 with Stirling depths

2021-06-10 22:35:46 +1200

With some distance variations, build rupture sets from NZ fault models, including Stirling 2010 - models = ['CFM_0_9_SANSTVZ_2010', 'CFM_0_9_SANSTVZ_D90'] - jump_limits = [10, 15] - adaptive_min_distances = [5, 7, 9] - thinning_factors = [0.0, 0.1]


Archived Index 00

Containing experiments with min_subsection_per_parent plauability filtering


Build NZ CFM 0.9 Stirling 2010 ruptsets with UCERF3 defaults

2021-06-10 22:23:06 +1200

With 'typical' UCERF3 settings, build rupture sets from NZ CFM 0.9 Stirling 2010 fault models SANS TVZ


2021-06-01 - Set 4 Inversions

48 Solutionsfrom 8 rupture sets (4 Azimuthal & 4 Coulomb); 6 completion energies: (0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001), 1 round


2021-05-26 - Set 3 Inversions

Inversions: 2 rounds, 2 durations (30m & 8hrs), 8 rupture sets (4 * Azimuthal & 4 * Coulomb)

Inversion Solution files


Common Rupture Sets top

These four Coulomb Rupture sets were produced, but are not yet uploaded here, TODO

2021-05-19 - Set 2

Thingbaijam et al.(2017) Crustal scaling relationship


2021-05-19 - Set 1

Shaw Mod 2009 scaling relationship